Peer Educators and Mentoring: A Re-Entry Model
June 6, 2024 – Peer mentoring involves individuals with shared experiences offering support and guidance to others. In corrections and reentry, this means people with similar backgrounds helping those with complex needs navigate their journey. This model has proven effective in behavioral health, with programs like Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) demonstrating that empathy and support from someone who has “been there” are invaluable.
The Strengths of Peer Mentoring
Peer mentoring offers numerous benefits, such as
- instilling hope,
- promoting positive self-identity,
- reducing stigma,
- and providing role models of strength and growth.
Connections with mentors help decrease isolation and foster a sense of community. Additionally, these relationships offer person-centered services and mutual learning, benefiting both mentors and mentees.
Peer Education in Corrections and Reentry
In recent years, peer education has gained traction in prisons and reentry programs, with evidence showing improved outcomes across various metrics. Peer educators and mentors, with their lived experiences, bring credibility and a non-judgmental approach that resonates with participants.
Enhancing Reentry Services
Peer mentoring enhances critical reentry services, including housing, healthcare, substance use treatment, and employment. Strong informal social bonds, whether with peer educators, faith-based groups, or community volunteers, are key predictors of whether individuals will avoid recidivism.
The Importance of Mentor-Participant Relationships
Research highlights the “intensity and quality of the mentor bond” as paramount. Successful peer mentoring relationships are characterized by
- clear roles and expectations,
- regular engagement,
- and purposeful relationships.
The quality of these relationships, marked by empathy, acceptance, and trust, significantly influences outcomes, aiding self-regulation and decision-making.
Varieties of Peer Mentoring Models
There is a wide variety of peer mentoring and peer educator program models. Despite this diversity, studies consistently show that peer mentoring positively impacts both participants and peer educators. Correctional facilities increasingly view peer education and mentoring as a cost-effective intervention with a good return on investment, enhancing programming and reentry practices.
Challenges and Benefits in Institutional Settings
Implementing peer educator programs in prisons and jails presents challenges, primarily due to the need for cultural shifts among staff. However, when well-executed, these programs offer numerous benefits, including cost savings, positive behavioral outcomes, access to programming despite staffing shortages, and improved safety. Additionally, these programs foster positive cultural interactions and improve self-regulation among participants.
Key Elements for Successful Peer Educator Models
Successful peer models share several crucial elements:
- Clearly defined program vision and purpose
- Established roles and expectations for peer educators and mentors
- A thorough peer educator/mentor selection process
- Targeted participant selection
- A research-based program model
- Clearly defined program pathways
- Ongoing training and support for both peer educators/mentors and staff
- Established policies and protocols for participant engagement
- Meaningful incentives
- Collaboration with the institution, justice agencies, reentry organizations, stakeholders, or other community programs
- Impact measures and effective implementation
By adhering to these principles, facilities and programs can ensure their peer-led programs are effective and sustainable.
How ACJI Can Help
The Alliance for Community and Justice Innovation (ACJI) offers support for implementing and scaling peer education or mentoring programs. Through comprehensive guidance, technical assistance, and access to practice toolkits, ACJI helps organizations design and maintain effective peer educator and mentoring models. Whether starting from scratch or enhancing an existing program, ACJI provides the resources and expertise needed to help you foster successful peer mentoring initiatives.
To learn more about our services, contact us. We will also be hosting a Learn@Work Live webinar on peer to peer mentoring in the fall. Sign up on our webinars page to be notified when registration opens.
1. Repper, J., Carter, T. (2011). A review of the literature on peer support in mental health services. Journal of Mental Health, 20(4), 392-411. Roberts, L., Salem, D., Rappaport, J., Toro, P., Luke, D. & Seidman, E. (1999). Giving and receiving help: interpersonal transactions in mutual-help meetings and psychosocial adjustment of members. American Journal of Community Psychology, 27(6), 841-865. Tracy, K. & Wallace, S.P. (2016). Benefits of peer support groups in the treatment of addiction. Substance Abuse and Rehabilitation, 7, 143-154. White, W. (2000).
The history of recovered people as wounded healers: II. The era of professionalization and specialization. Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly, 18(2), 1-25.
2. Rhode Island Peer Recovery Specialist Certification: Study Guide for the Certification Exam. Prepared by: JSI Research & Training Institute, Inc. For: Rhode Island Department of Behavioral Healthcare, Developmental Disabilities and Hospitals, March 2016).
3. Lopez-Humphreys, M. and Teater, B.; Peer mentoring justice-involved youth: a training model to promote secondary desistance and restorative justice among mentors', (2018) The International Journal of Restorative Justice 187-209.
4. Cobbs Fletcher, R. (2007). Mentoring Ex Prisoners: A Guide for Prisoner Reentry Programs. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor.
5. Petersilia, J. (2003). When prisoners come home: Parole and Prisoner Reentry. Oxford University Press.
6. Males, P.J. Francisco Ochoa, and Sorio, R. (2017). “Mentoring as a Strategy to Support Youth Social Inclusion Processes: Evidence and Challenges,” Inter-American Development Bank, Technical Note No. IDB-TN-1265, 45.
7. Lambert, M.; Barley, D. (2001). Research Summary of the Therapeutic Relationship and Psychotherapy Outcome. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training. Volume 38. 357-361.
8. Raposa, E. B., Ben‐Eliyahu, A., Olsho, L. E., & Rhodes, J. (2019). Birds of a feather: is matching based on shared interests and characteristics associated with longer youth mentoring relationships? Journal of Community Psychology. 1–13. Volume 47, Issue 2 (385-387)
9. Hemmelgarn, A. L., Glisson, C., & James, L.R. (2006). Organizational Culture and Climate: Implications for Services and Intervention Research. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice
10. Bassuk EL, Hanson J, Greene RN, Richard M, Laudet A (2016) Peer-delivered recovery support services for addictions in the United States: a systematic review. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 63: 1–9.
11. Maza Cabrera, I., Estrella, R., and Miller, Thwin, G.K. (2021). Peer Mentoring Guide. National Mentoring Resource Center.
